Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 12 results ...

Anand, K B and Ramamurthy, K (2003) Laboratory-Based Productivity Study on Alternative Masonry Systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(03), 237–42.

Bashford, H H, Sawhney, A, Walsh, K D and Kot, K (2003) Implications of Even Flow Production Methodology for U.S. Housing Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(03), 330–7.

Chua, D K H, Shen, L J and Bok, S H (2003) Constraint-Based Planning with Integrated Production Scheduler over Internet. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(03), 293–301.

Eldin, N and Hikle, V (2003) Pilot Study of Quality Function Deployment in Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(03), 314–29.

Frutos, J D and Borenstein, D (2003) Object-Oriented Model for Customer-Building Company Interaction in Mass Customization Environment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(03), 302–13.

Huang, X and Hinze, J (2003) Analysis of Construction Worker Fall Accidents. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(03), 262–71.

Pheng, L S and Pong, C Y (2003) Integrating ISO 9001 and OHSAS 18001 for Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(03), 338–47.

Seydel, J (2003) Evaluating and Comparing Bidding Optimization Effectiveness. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(03), 285–92.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Bidding; Optimization; Neural networks; Probabilistic methods; Construction industry; construction industry; civil engineering; cost optimal control; neural nets; probabilistic logic;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:3(285)
  • Abstract:
    Competitive bidding is the means by which pricing of numerous services takes place. Optimization models have been developed to support bidding, but no consistent and structured methodology has been followed in evaluating those models. This paper provides such a methodology and demonstrates it in the comparison of three bidding optimization approaches aimed at profit maximization. The methodology represents a modification and refinement of previously used evaluation approaches. In addition, the methodology incorporates the determination of an upper bound on effectiveness in order to provide an indicator of how much improvement in effectiveness remains. Real construction bidding data are used to demonstrate the comparison of the optimization procedures.

Thomas, H R, Horman, M J, Minchin, R E and Chen, D (2003) Improving Labor Flow Reliability for Better Productivity as Lean Construction Principle. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(03), 251–61.

Tischer, T E and Kuprenas, J A (2003) Bridge Falsework Productivity—Measurement and Influences. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(03), 243–50.

Touran, A (2003) Probabilistic Model for Cost Contingency. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(03), 280–4.

Wilmot, C G and Cheng, G (2003) Estimating Future Highway Construction Costs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(03), 272–9.